12 kontroversielle spørgsmål fra Angela Merkel

Angela Merkel har stillet alle regeringer i EU 12 kontroversielle spørgsmål angående EU’s forfatning. Hverken spørgsmål eller svar er blevet offentliggjort. NyAgenda bringer her alle 12 spørgsmål. 


Spørgsmål til medlemslandene fra det tyske formandskab. Skal diskuteres på konsultationer fra d. 23. april til 4. maj 2007.

1. How do you assess the proposal made by some Member States not to repeal the existing treaties but to return to the classical method of treaty changes while preserving the single legal personality and overcoming the pillar structure of the EU?

2. How do you assess in that case the proposal made by some Member States that the consolidated approach of part 1 of the Constitutional Treaty is preserved, with the necessary presentational changes resulting from the return to the classical method of treaty changes?

3. How do you assess in that case the proposal made by some Member States to use different terminology without changing the legal substance for example with regard to the title of the treaty, the denomination of EU legal acts and the Union’s Minister for Foreign Affairs?

4. How do you assess the proposal made by some Member States to drop the article that refers to the symbols of the EU?

5. How do you assess the proposal made by some Member States to drop the article which states the primacy of EU law?

6. How do you assess the proposal made by some Member States that Member States will replace the full text of the Charter of Fundamental Rights by a short cross reference having the same legal value?

7. Do you agree that the institutional provisions of the Constitutional Treaty form a balanced package that should not be reopened?

8. Are there other elements which in your view constitute indispensable parts of the overall compromise reached at the time?

9. How do you assess the proposal made by some Member States concerning possible improvements/clarifications on issues related to new challenges facing the EU, for instance in the fields of energy/climate change or illegal immigration?

10. How do you assess the proposal made by some Member States to highlight the Copenhagen criteria in the article on enlargement?

11. How do you assess the proposal made by some Member States to address the social dimension of the EU in some way or the other?

12. How do you assess the proposal made by some Member States applying opt-in/out provisions to some of the new policy provisions set out in the Constitutional Treaty?





grubler


'Et nej den 3.dec. er ikke blot et isoleret dansk nej. Det understreger, at der i mange lande, specielt i Nordeuropa er modstand mod ideen om EU som en statsdannelse, hvor alle skal være med til alt.'.
Drude Dahlerup

MAILINGLISTE

Send mig nyt fra NyAgenda


Ny Agenda

sekretariat@
nyagenda.dk




STØT OS

Du kan støtte NyAgendas arbejde ved at indbetale et beløb på:
Reg.: 8411
Kontonr.: 4093 555


NyAgenda har modtaget støtte fra bl.a. PLUM-fonden og Nævnet for EU-oplysning